Skip to content

A Fortiori Argument in the Bible

    The fortiori argument is one of the most powerful arguments for the existence of God. It is based on the premise that if one thing is true, then another must also be true. A powerful example of a fortiori argument in the bible is Luke 16:11, where Jesus says: “If you have not been faithful with worldly wealth, who will entrust you with true riches?” This basically means: If you (S) have not been [trustworthy (R) enough to be] faithful with worldly wealth (Q), then you (S) will not be [trustworthy (R) enough to be] faithful with spiritual wealth (P). This is purely a fortiori argument. Another Example is Mathew 7:11 where Jesus says: If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him!” The Bible contains examples of this reasoning, as well as many other examples. It is a very powerful argument that has many applications.

    A Fortiori Argument In The Bible

    The Bible contains several examples of the fortiori argument. Some examples are 2nd Samuel 4:18-19, Job 4:18-19, Prov 11:31, Ezek 14:12-21, Matt 7:11, Luke 12:11-13, Rom 5:9-10, and 2 Cor 3:11. Fortiori arguments are a popular method for explaining the relationship between two propositions or two values.

    A fortiori argument is logical in that it starts with an accepted truth and then goes from there to a related one. For example, if a drifter is a sinner, he will be judged more harshly than the one who has not. The writer then offers a reason for the judgment and cites Scripture and experience to make this argument.

    See also  What Time Is the Sixth Hour in the Bible

    Fortiori arguments are often used in the Bible, both in Jewish and Christian literature. While the fortiori argument has no technical name in the Bible, it has been around for a long time. It is most likely that the argument originated in the Greek and Roman worlds, but is still very common in the Bible.

    Jesus’ argument is an example of a fortiori argument in the Bible. It is based on the controversial idea that Jesus is God’s son. If the premise is true, the argument should reach a crescendo. For example, if a man is valuable enough to be lifted out of a pit on the Sabbath, then that man must also be valuable enough to receive healing on that Sabbath.

    The fortiori argument is a form of logic that aims to support a predicate by comparing two propositions. The same applies for a contraposition. A fortiori argument is used to prove the Bible is trustworthy. The Bible teaches that God is the creator of the universe.

    A fortiori argument in the Bible is the same way that the Talmud describes the argument in legal contexts. The Talmud calls this kind of argument a dayo device. It insists that the second situation be judged as if it were the first one. Thus, the second situation does not warrant a higher rate of judgment.

    Another example of a fortiori argument in the Bible is Jesus’ argument that circumcision of a man on the Sabbath is not against the Mosaic law. The same can be said for healing a man’s whole body on the Sabbath. In either case, the conclusion is not wrong and thus is deemed to be passable.

    See also  What Does Slew Mean in the Bible

    A Fortiori Rationale

    The Bible contains at least three instances of the a fortiori rationale. These instances, primarily in Job, argue that man cannot judge God. Despite the lack of standard forms in the NT, they do make clear the intention behind the language. In these cases, the a fortiori argument is meant to arouse fear in the audience.

    Fortiori rationales use a series of inferential and historical conclusions to prove a proposition. This type of reasoning builds momentum in the application of doctrine, and it allows the mature believer to draw doctrinal conclusions under testing and in a crisis. This type of rationale relates certainty to certainty, dogma to dogma, and certainty to certainty.

    Fortiori arguments are also known as crescendo arguments. These arguments go from a minor premise to a major one. The third premise is about proportionality. By making a fortiori argument, the speakers logically need to add this third premise in order to justify their conclusion.

    Fortiori reasoning is used in biblical text to establish the relationship between a premise and its consequent. In Hebrew, the premise and conclusion are linked together by the afortiori operator, hine/af. The antecedent is signaled by a verb, be; the consequent is a verb.

    Fortiori arguments in the Bible are often made in the form of a compound antecedent, an if-then argument. This means that the transition from seven to seventy-seven does not obey the dayo rule. Furthermore, it has a weak deductive foundation. Furthermore, the passage does not have any halakhic authority. In fact, it is the private pronouncement of the Lemekh and does not claim to be authoritative.

    See also  Who Fasted in the Bible for 3 Days

    The logic behind the logistical blessings that God bestows upon believers is that the aforesaid blessings support the believer’s perfect righteousness, which in turn helps him receive special blessings during the present time. These special blessings also guarantee that he will receive even greater blessings in eternity. These eternal blessings will glorify God forever, which in turn makes the situation justified.

    In the NT, Paul uses the afores argument more than any other speaker, although only in two places does he use this method. While it is true that Paul employs the afores in his Epistles to the Hebrews, the argument has no basis in the NT.

    Comments are closed.